----- Original Message ----- 
From: The John Birch Society
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 1:00 PM
Subject: Stop Internet Censorship Bill






      Stop Internet Censorship Bill

      There certainly hasn’t been any lack of attempts by the U.S. government 
-- elected 
Representatives and Senators, and White House -- to try to regulate/control the 
Internet in 
this session of Congress. It seems a new cybersecurity bill pops up at least 
once a week. 
The latest one catching all the attention is the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), 
H.R. 3261. 
SOPA is a beefed-up version of the failed Protect IP Act.

      Whereas SOPA is heavily supported by Hollywood producers, the recording 
industry, and 
large media companies and their lobbyists as a way to protect their copyrighted 
material, 
SOPA's opponents include major Internet giants like Google, Yahoo, Facebook, 
and Twitter, as 
well as civil liberties groups, Tea Party groups, and investors.

      Under the proposal any website, including search engines like Google, 
could be forced 
to delist whole domains on the basis of a copyright claim by a content 
provider. Internet 
Providers would be forced into monitoring websites that contain user-generated 
content 
because embedding and posting and sharing videos, etc., could be a violation of 
SOPA. This 
would be a severe limiting of the currently used and understood Fair Use 
doctrine. 
Unauthorized streaming would become a felony. And SOPA could eliminate the 
alternative media 
so prevalent on the Internet for simply unknowingly embedding unauthorized 
videos or links; 
perhaps even quoting from copyrighted material would be enough to “delist” the 
domain name 
of the website.

      David Ulevich, an expert in Internet security calls the legislation 
“dangerous” for 
three reasons: 1) “there is no way to censor only illegal content without 
harming legitimate 
uses on sites as well,” 2) it will create a firewall to “censor websites 
similar to those 
countries we criticize for the same behavior,” and 3) it will "burden companies 
with an 
onerous level of liability for all user-generated content.”

      Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) said this about the bill: "It could set a 
precedent for 
further control and censorship of the Internet by foreign governments, and risk 
the 
fragmentation of the global domain name system.” Reporters Without Borders said 
the bill is 
“clearly hostile to freedom of expression.” While a Harvard Business Review 
blogger stated 
the bill would “give America its very own version of the Great Firewall of 
China,” because 
of the imposition of content filtering and blocking without any independent 
judicial 
control. That’s right.  According to a C-Net analysis of the bill, SOPA “would 
let content 
owners bypass cops, courts, and any semblance of due process, and ‘disappear’ 
entire Web 
domains like some kind of privatized secret police force.”

      The bill, so broadly written, is a danger to Internet freedom, has 
devastating 
penalties that are rather disconnected from alleged violations of the bill, 
could certainly 
kill any new e-commerce or normal Internet usage, issues rather vague 
requirements to 
Internet Service Providers, and has the potential for International 
consequences that could 
result in court challenges by foreign countries, all because the measure is so 
completely 
out of sync with the current Internet structure and how it operates.

      The Internet has become an incredible force that promotes free speech and 
alternative 
views and information. Also, according to a "Dear Colleague" letter written by 
Representatives Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) on November 
8, 2011: 
"Online innovation and commerce were responsible for 15 percent of U.S. GDP 
growth from 2004 
to 2009, according to the McKinsey Global Institute." However, after reviewing 
SOPA, many 
venture capitalists say there is no way they would invest money in the Internet 
under the 
risky conditions SOPA would impose.

      Speak out about Internet censorship by contacting your Representative and 
Senators 
immediately, as this bill is sure to see more action before the end of the 
year. It is a 
government-interference Internet bill of great magnitude that would in fact 
destroy the 
Internet as we now know it, creating a new bureaucracy with the U.S. Government 
as the 
Internet police.

      Thanks,

      Your friends at The John Birch Society







--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      You have received this message because you have subscribed to a mailing 
list of The 
John Birch Society. If you do not wish to receive periodic emails from this 
source, please 
click below to unsubscribe.
      http://www.votervoice.net/link/unsub/a/jbs/8G5zQQqz.aspx

 

-- 
APFN-1 YahooGroups:
Subscribe:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apfn-1/join
Unsubscribe:  apfn-1-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

APFN MSG BOARD:
`In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.'
http://disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/149495.html

APFN CONTENTS PAGE:
http://www.apfn.org/old/apfncont.htm

APFN TWITTER
http://twitter.com/signup?follow=APFN1

Find elected officials, including the president, members of
Congress, governors, state legislators, local officials, and more.
http://congress.org/congressorg/dbq/officials/

SUPPORT APFN:
PMB 206, 7549 W. CACTUS RD. #104, PEORIA, AZ 85381

Reply via email to