Hi Ken-ichi, this indeed is a bug in our code and I have created an issue with explanations for it here: http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-2444
Hope to get his fixed soon. Thanks for reporting! Markus On 08 Sep 2014, at 19:29, Ken-ichi <kenichi.ueda at gmail.com> wrote: > When viewing many (most?) of the iNat records on GBIF, I see a yellow > box at the top of the page listing some "Interpretation Issues." Some > of them I understand, like derived country, since iNat doesn't report > the country, just the coordinates, but the following are more opaque: > > * Recorded date unlikely > * Modified date unlikely > * Identified date unlikely > > Here's an example: http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/923925309. As far as > I know, all three dates are accurate for that record. Why does GBIF > think they're "unlikely"? > > I suppose this is only tangentially related to the API, so if I should > be directing this elsewhere please let me know. > > -ken-ichi > _______________________________________________ > API-users mailing list > API-users at lists.gbif.org > http://lists.gbif.org/mailman/listinfo/api-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.gbif.org/pipermail/api-users/attachments/20140909/92a1ed6c/attachment.html
