On 2/4/10 8:54 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny<[email protected]>wrote:
I'd be careful to remove interfaces. As an API you have to allow the
broadest range of implementation possibilities. Interfaces are good to have.
When in doubt keep the interface.
Another possibility (in conjonction with he fact that we might want to
have schema aware entries) is to use a factory to build entries, instead
of having a constructor.
If we have to keep the Interface, what would be the name for the class ?
EntryImpl ? DefaultEntry?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
