On 03/17/2017 11:00 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > The only requirement is that each SC has its own builder (we can't put > this code in the abstract SC, because it's abstract...)
With some generics magic it should at least be possible to move common stuff (setOid) to the parent. Otherwise, I'm not sure if it's worth to create builders for all the "simple" syntax checkers (Boolean, DirectoryString, etc.) or if just a singleton immutable instance is sufficient. But in general it makes sense to have immutable syntax checkers :)
