Le 07/09/2017 à 22:20, Chris Pike a écrit : > So I added the controls, but they don't seem to be working. We are getting a > error code 53 (unwilling to preform) when we add the control to our request, > so assuming there is something wrong with the control, but don't know enough > about ldap or the library to know what. Any ideas on what to try or what > might be wrong?
We need more info to be able to understand what's wrong : - a capture of the messages being exchanged (wireshark) - the server you use > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Pike" <clp...@psu.edu> > To: "api" <api@directory.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 6:50:37 PM > Subject: Re: Ldap API Custom Controls > > Thanks for the suggestions and code examples. I'll work on adding this new > control and let you know if I have any issues. > > ~Chris Pike > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Emmanuel Lécharny" <elecha...@gmail.com> > To: "api" <api@directory.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 3:46:49 AM > Subject: Re: Ldap API Custom Controls > > Le 04/09/2017 à 09:16, Radovan Semancik a écrit : >> On 09/04/2017 09:02 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>> Actually, the tricky part is the grammar, which is a state engine >>> description. >> Oh, that is usually not that difficult either. Most of those "custom" >> controls are very simple. Just a couple of fields. Complex data >> structures seem to be very rare. If you start with existing control >> that is somehow similar it is not difficult to implement a new control. > FTR, the code I provided yesterday night in one of my previous mail took > me around 30 mins, all included. For a more complex control, like > syncrepl, that would have takne a bit more time, mainly because you want > to add unit tests to cover teh various cases. > > Now, I think that we should provide a bit of documentation about how to > implement a control... > -- Emmanuel Lecharny Symas.com directory.apache.org
