stas        2002/12/14 20:03:43

  Modified:    .        Makefile.PL Changes
  Log:
  Strongly suggest win32 users to upgrade to 5.8.0, if they run 5.6.x
  Submitted by: Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Reviewed by:  stas
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.88      +7 -2      modperl-2.0/Makefile.PL
  
  Index: Makefile.PL
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/Makefile.PL,v
  retrieving revision 1.87
  retrieving revision 1.88
  diff -u -r1.87 -r1.88
  --- Makefile.PL       29 Jun 2002 19:44:04 -0000      1.87
  +++ Makefile.PL       15 Dec 2002 04:03:43 -0000      1.88
  @@ -298,13 +298,18 @@
   sub perl_version_check {
       if ($] < 5.006_001) {
           error "You are running Perl version 5.6.0\n" .
  -          "We strongly suggest you upgrade to at least 5.6.1";
  +            "We strongly suggest you upgrade to at least 5.6.1";
       }
   
       if ($] >= 5.007 and $] < 5.008) {
           error "5.7.x development versions of Perl are no longer supported\n" .
  -          "Upgrade to 5.8.0 or higher";
  +            "Upgrade to 5.8.0 or higher";
           exit 1;
  +    }
  +
  +    if (WIN32 and $] < 5.008) {
  +        error "You are running a Perl version 5.6.x\n" .
  +            "We strongly suggest you upgrade to 5.8\n";
       }
   }
   
  
  
  
  1.82      +3 -0      modperl-2.0/Changes
  
  Index: Changes
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/Changes,v
  retrieving revision 1.81
  retrieving revision 1.82
  diff -u -r1.81 -r1.82
  --- Changes   14 Dec 2002 17:29:34 -0000      1.81
  +++ Changes   15 Dec 2002 04:03:43 -0000      1.82
  @@ -10,6 +10,9 @@
   
   =item 1.99_08-dev
   
  +Strongly suggest win32 users to upgrade to 5.8.0, if they run 5.6.x
  +[Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
  +
   When installing the mod_perl shared object, first need to check
   whether the directory 'modules' already exists, and create it if not.
   [Randy Kobes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
  
  
  


Reply via email to