Hello Ronald,

    Thanks for bringing this up. I have looked into it and would like to 
provide you with an explanation on why these two /24s are recorded in the APNIC 
registry.

    The mentioned two /24s belong to APNIC. We nominated them to IANA in the 
RFC 5737 "IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation" in 2010. 

    https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5737.html

    You can see the following message in the "Acknowledgments" section of the 
RFC5737. 

    "The authors would like to offer a special note of thanks to APNIC, which 
nominated 198.51.100.0/24 and 203.0.113.0/24 for this purpose."

    We were asked by IANA to register the following objects in the APNIC Whois 
database at that time for public information.

    inetnum: 198.51.100.0 - 198.51.100.255
    netname: TEST-NET-2
    descr: IANA
    descr: RFC5737 Documentation Address Block
    country: AU
    admin-c: HM20-AP
    tech-c: HM20-AP
    mnt-by: APNIC-HM
    mnt-routes: APNIC-HM
    status: ASSIGNED PORTABLE
    remarks: -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    remarks: This block is reserved for use in documentation and
    remarks: should not be used in any real networks.
    remarks: Please see more details at
    remarks: http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5737
    remarks: -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    changed: [email protected] 20100617
    source: APNIC

    inetnum: 203.0.113.0 - 203.0.113.255
    netname: TEST-NET-3
    descr: IANA
    descr: RFC5737 Documentation Address Block
    country: AU
    admin-c: HM20-AP
    tech-c: HM20-AP
    mnt-by: APNIC-HM
    mnt-routes: APNIC-HM
    status: ASSIGNED PORTABLE
    remarks: -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    remarks: This block is reserved for use in documentation and
    remarks: should not be used in any real networks.
    remarks: Please see more details at
    remarks: http://www.iana.org/go/rfc5737
    remarks: -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-++-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
    changed: [email protected] 20100617
    source: APNIC

Later, the NRO generated the daily stats file to combine all RIR data and IANA 
data to provide an overview of the status of all number resources. We knew 
there would be a conflict between APNIC data and IANA data regarding these 
ranges. We chose the IANA data as the higher level information in the NRO stats 
file. 

        iana|ZZ|ipv4|198.51.100.0|256|20090714|reserved|ietf|iana
        iana|ZZ|ipv4|203.0.113.0|256|20090714|reserved|ietf|iana

    The information in the APNIC registry is to provide further details to the 
public. We have the same message "those ranges are reserved for documentation", 
just at different levels. 

    I would like to use this opportunity to remind others that there are 
special resource ranges for documentation guided by RFCs.

    IPv4:   192.0.2.0/24, 198.51.100.0/24, 203.0.113.0/24 (RFC5737)
    IPv6:   2001:DB8::/32 (RFC3849)
    ASN:   64496 – 64511 (16-bit, 2-byte), 65536 – 65551 (32-bit, 4-byte) 
(RFC5398)

    Please feel free to use them as examples when you write documents or do 
presentations. You don't need to use private IP or someone's IP as an example 😊

    Kind regards,

    Guangliang
    =========


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
On Behalf Of Ronald F. Guilmette
Sent: Saturday, 31 July 2021 6:04 PM
To: RT_Hostmaster <[email protected]>
Cc: mailman_APNIC-talk <[email protected]>
Subject: [apnic-talk] RFC reserved IP blocks in the APNIC WHOIS data base

APNIC Hostmaster,

The following two IP address blocks are reserved as per RFC 5737, Section 3:

    198.51.100.0/24
    203.0.113.0/24

As per RFC 5737, Section 3, these two blocks do not belong to any specific or 
particular Regional Internet Registry, nor should they be assigned to any 
individual or particular resource member of any particular RIR.  Both blocks 
are effectively reserved by IANA, based on RFC 5737, and that fact is reflected 
in the NRO's daily stats file, where these blocks are quite clearly assigned to 
and associated with
IANA:

    iana|ZZ|ipv4|198.51.100.0|256|20090714|reserved|ietf|iana
    iana|ZZ|ipv4|203.0.113.0|256|20090714|reserved|ietf|iana

Nontheless, these two blocks are also incorrectly mentioned in APNIC's own 
daily stats file, where they are incorrectly represented as allocations under 
the administration of APNIC:

    apnic||ipv4|198.51.100.0|256||reserved|
    apnic||ipv4|203.0.113.0|256||reserved|

Please remove all references to these two RFC-reserved IPv4 address blocks from 
both the APNIC WHOIS data base and also from the APNIC daily stats file.  All 
such mentions of either block in APNIC-specific data bases or data files are 
invalid and are in direct conflict with NRO/IANA supplied information as noted 
above.


Regards,
rfg

_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailman.apnic.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fapnic-talk&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7Ce735bd086f6d45ad17e108d953f9bf4b%7C127d8d0d7ccf473dab096e44ad752ded%7C0%7C0%7C637633154899386574%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=03Ds%2BxU2taFV6Q6BAkqsha0%2BUqCMTTISdSisi5DxOEg%3D&amp;reserved=0
_______________________________________________
apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/apnic-talk

Reply via email to