> On 25-Aug-2022, at 12:52, aftab.siddi...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Gaurav, > Thanks for your comments > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 16:31, Gaurav Kansal <gaurav.kan...@nic.in > <mailto:gaurav.kan...@nic.in>> wrote: > We should avoid un-limited number of terms for any member in any role, like > max 2 consecutive tenure for any post and a cool off period of 2-4 years for > next tenure and have a max limit on an individual member tenures. > > NRC is for review of all elected community nominations. For this particular > suggestion, you have to change SIG guidelines, NRO-NC election procedure and > also the APNIC bylaws. This change is out of the scope of NRC but your point > is taken and NRC can publish the number of years a candidate has already > served on a particular seat. For NomCom or NRC, or whatever for this proposal is, don’t it need the same approvals, which are required for bringing the reforms in the current election processes ? As per the timeline/stages section, it look like this document/proposal is pushed from the top to the bottom and set timelines are very stringent. Don’t it be better if we have the election and voting rights reforms before this NRC/NomCom ? Also, what’s the general trend in APNIC w.r.t. proposals ? Is it top-down approach or bottom-up approach, as this proposal is first reviewed by the top and then shared with the community, so is it a general trend in APNIC ? I am considering that APNIC doesn’t think that elected members or the APNIC leaders are the only wise members in this region.
> > This will help in bringing the new blood into the system and will be able to > achieve geographical diversity , plus a rotation will be able to help us in > catching the flaws/frauds in the very early stages. > > If you read the document then you will understand how we are supporting at > least the geographical diversity in the NRC. While I do support your point of > geographical diversity, to make it clear Diversity is not about geography > only and we have to make APNIC more inclusive at every level. > > from geographical pov > EC - 7 members representing 7 different economies > NRO NC - 3 members 3 different economies > SIG - Routing Security - 3 members 3 economies > SIG - Cooperation - 2 members 2 economies > SIG - NIR - 2 members 2 economies > SIG - Policy - 3 members 3 economies > > Out of these 20 elected members there are at least 15 different economies > represented here out of 56 economies of APNIC service region. > > We have to think and achieve the resilience so that we should be in a same > position of AFRINIC. > > Any further suggestions to improve the NRC? In one of the discussions, I proposed for building the appropriate resilience at various levels of the core institutions of APNIC in order to prevent any major disruptions to the operations of APNIC. To start with we can explore the feasibility of setting up a regional office of APNIC in any other member country and distribute some of the resources of APNIC across different geographies, So that any legal/regulatory actions of one host country doesn't bring the operations of APNIC to a standstill. Unfortunately, I didn’t get views of APNIC on this. Thanks, Gaurav Kansal > > > Regards, > > Aftab A. Siddiqui > > >> On 25-Aug-2022, at 05:38, aftab.siddi...@gmail.com >> <mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Everyone, >> >> As you are aware the current nomination process for any community elected >> position is defined where APNIC secretariat sends the call for nomination on >> various forums and once they (secretariat) receives the nominations an >> internal due diligence process is performed and then the names of nominees >> are published with their details. The process ran so far on a need-to-know >> basis and the community had access to information that was deemed essential >> by the Secretariat. In order to build a strong and community driven >> structure it is important to have community oversight in the whole process, >> which at the moment doesn't exist. For that reason we are proposing a new >> committee called "Nomination Review Committee" and we believe that it will >> bring much needed improvements to the process of electing members to various >> community elected positions. >> >> Please review the proposal here >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w0uANFm5j1qCFCxQR_rXlwyGg_4NXme50J-HcZ0QeQM/edit?usp=sharing> >> and provide your feedback through the mailing list. We are also organising >> a BoF >> <https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/6/bof---apnic-nominating-committee-nomcom> >> on 14th Sep during APNIC54 to further discuss this in-person/online. >> >> BoF: >> https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/6/bof---apnic-nominating-committee-nomcom >> >> <https://conference.apnic.net/54/program/schedule/#/day/6/bof---apnic-nominating-committee-nomcom> >> >> Link: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w0uANFm5j1qCFCxQR_rXlwyGg_4NXme50J-HcZ0QeQM/edit?usp=sharing >> >> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1w0uANFm5j1qCFCxQR_rXlwyGg_4NXme50J-HcZ0QeQM/edit?usp=sharing> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Aftab A. Siddiqui >> On behalf of SIG Chairs/Co-Chairs >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy - https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-pol...@lists.apnic.net/ >> <https://mailman.apnic.net/sig-pol...@lists.apnic.net/> >> To unsubscribe send an email to sig-policy-le...@lists.apnic.net >> <mailto:sig-policy-le...@lists.apnic.net> > > <https://amritmahotsav.nic.in/>
_______________________________________________ apnic-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net/ To unsubscribe send an email to apnic-talk-le...@lists.apnic.net
