On 02/24/2012 08:46 AM, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2012 schrieb John Johansen: >> On 02/15/2012 03:01 AM, Christian Boltz wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2012 schrieb John Johansen: >>>> Allow the capability rule to be bare to represent all >>>> capabilities >>>> similar to how network, and other rule types work. >>>> >>>> capability, >>> >>> I hope not too many people use this ;-) but nevertheless here's >>> the >>> patch to update apparmor.vim to support it. Using just >>> "capability" will be marked in the "dangerous capability" color. >>> >>> Additionally, the patch removes the (already commented out) code >>> for "set capability". >> >> can you commit this, I have tried a couple of times with the attached >> patch and patch just fails complaining of a malformed patch > > I'm not surprised about the complaints ;-) because I already commited it > to trunk (r1937). (Did you run "make" to generate an up-to-date > apparmor.vim from the *.in?) > > hrmm no that wasn't the type of complaints I was getting otherwise I might have notice. Oh well at least its in thanks
The 2.7 branch doesn't need the patch because 2.7 doesn't support > capability, > ("capability $whatever" is already supported in 2.7's apparmor.vim) > > > Regards, > > Christian Boltz -- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor