On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:27:48AM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > On 04/11/2012 10:09 AM, Steve Beattie wrote: > > For the record, what I was hoping/exoecting the 'in' syntax would > > accomplish was eliminating the need to write stuff like the latter; > > i.e. that > > > > mount options in (ro, atime) /dev/foo, > > > > would be equivalent to > > > > mount options=ro /dev/foo, > > mount options=atime /dev/foo, > > > that is close to what I intended, I did it as > mount options=(ro,atime) /dev/foo, > mount options=ro /dev/foo, > mount options=atime /dev/foo,
Wait, the mount options don't accumulate? So mount options=ro /dev/foo, mount options=atime /dev/foo, would allow mount -o ro /dev/foo /some/mnt/location/ and mount -o atime /dev/foo /some/mnt/location/ but would not allow mount -o ro,atime /dev/foo /some/mnt/location/ ? This is seriously confusing. -- Steve Beattie <[email protected]> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
