On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 05:32:43PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > OK. Before I update aa-decode in the 2.8 branch, I have an additional > question (which I forgot when I wrote the previous mail): > > I have a small patch pending for aa-decode which got some discussion in > November, but no formal ACK or NACK. > See "[patch] aa-decode performance tuning" from 2012-11-01. > > I could interpret this as "nobody objected + timeout", but I'd prefer a > more formal response ;-) (preferable an ACK ;-) > > I'd also like to include the performance patch in the 2.8 tree. > Therefore I'll wait with backporting aa-decode until I have a response > for the performance tuning patch.
Upon review, Acked-by: Steve Beattie <sbeat...@ubuntu.com> for the conversion to using bash's builtin regex test, for both trunk and as part the wholesale backport of aa-decode to the 2.8 branch. Thanks! -- Steve Beattie <sbeat...@ubuntu.com> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
