On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:27:49PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > > - /* unconfined profiles don't have a mode string appended */ > > - if (!unconfined(profile)) > > + /* 'unconfined' profile don't have a mode string appended */ > > + unconfined = unconfined(profile) && profile == profile->ns->unconfined; > > + if (!unconfined) > > mode_len = strlen(mode_str) + 3; /* + 3 for _() */ > > Oh, this is a bit unfortunate. (Also, && feels wrong, should it be > ||?) Can unconfined() be extended to handle this case? Would it be > wrong elsewhere?
Okay, ignore the second bit here, the next patch explains it. :) I'm still curious about && vs || though.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
