On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 06:27:11PM -0700, Tyler Hicks wrote: > I thought about doing that, but obviously didn't. For no good reason > other than that I didn't put a lot of thought into those errno values > and didn't want to commit to them with documentation. ENOENT is really > the only one that I applications should be relying on at this time. > > Does that sound reasonable?
Sure. :) Thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
