On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 05:03:08PM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > No. I considered doing this, and nearly did it. It is remapped higher for > a few reasons. Having it not be 0 allowed catching a few things during > dev, where an 0 initialized value was being passed through (remapping > after that could have been done). However 0 is used a lot of places > in the dfa to indicate a special transition between certain elements > and I wanted to keep that flexibility here, if we ever decided to > use it.
Ah, I like the catching errors approach.. > Finally the biggest reason being now that we have shipped it having it > move back to 0 means an abi bump and more code to handle that. ... and I had figured this would be the response. :) Thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
