Hello,
Am Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2015 schrieb John Johansen:
> On 10/20/2015 02:57 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > Now that make -C utils needs the in-tree libapparmor, those
> > files become annoying in the bzr status output ;-)
>
> err needs? I remember a patch that provides USE_SYSTEM=
> I don't remember anything that required in-tree libapparmor, I would
> have NAKed it :)
I missed to include "check", so actually I'm talking about
make -C utils check
(just "make"ing the utils doesn't need libapparmor)
The patch you are talking about means that by default (= without
USE_SYSTEM=1), the in-tree libapparmor and python modules will be used.
With USE_SYSTEM, the system libapparmor (and - new! - also the system
python modules) will be used.
So in practise it's easier to compile the in-tree libapparmor than to
type USE_SYSTEM=1 every time ;-)
That said - what about the .bzrignore additions?
> > I propose this patch for trunk and 2.9.
> >
> >
> > [ bzrignore-libapparmor.diff ]
> >
> > --- .bzrignore 2015-06-06 18:15:56.084323368 +0200
> > +++ .bzrignore 2015-10-20 23:50:55.913670577 +0200
> > @@ -46,7 +46,10 @@
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/doc/Makefile
> > libraries/libapparmor/doc/Makefile.in
> > libraries/libapparmor/doc/*.2
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/doc/aa_*.3
> > +libraries/libapparmor/include/Makefile
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/include/Makefile.in
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/include/sys/Makefile
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/include/sys/Makefile.in
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/.deps
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/.libs
> >
> > @@ -54,10 +57,16 @@
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/Makefile.in
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/af_protos.h
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/change_hat.lo
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/src/features.lo
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/grammar.lo
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/src/kernel.lo
> > +libraries/libapparmor/src/kernel_interface.lo
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/libaalogparse.lo
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/libimmunix_warning.lo
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/src/policy_cache.lo
> > +libraries/libapparmor/src/private.lo
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/scanner.lo
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/src/libapparmor.pc
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/libapparmor.la
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/libimmunix.la
> > libraries/libapparmor/src/grammar.c
> >
> > @@ -74,12 +83,18 @@
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/Makefile.in
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/Makefile.perl
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/Makefile.perle
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/MYMETA.json
> > +libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/MYMETA.yml
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/blib
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/libapparmor_wrap.c
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/perl/pm_to_blib
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/__init__.py
> > +libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/build/
> > +libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/libapparmor_wrap.c
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/Makefile
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/Makefile.in
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/setup.py
> >
> > +libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/test/Makefile
> >
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/python/test/Makefile.in
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/ruby/Makefile
> > libraries/libapparmor/swig/ruby/Makefile.in
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
> Aber nochmal zu MEINEM Problem: ich habe genau 2 Programme denen
> ich verbieten will (egal auf welchem port) eine Verbindung nach
> aussen herzustellen. OS ist WinXP.
Und wie heißt das andere Programm?
[> Ralf Kuntoff und Rainer Koenig in dcsf]
--
AppArmor mailing list
AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
