Hello,
Am Mittwoch, 30. November 2016, 15:52:47 CET schrieb Seth Arnold:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 03:31:59PM -0800, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > The alternative patch removes the techdoc and the steps to build it
> > entirely. It has not been updated meaningfully since 2007, and no
> > one
> > seems to have time to take on bringing it up to date. Furthermore,
> > John has created his own (unfinished) set of documentation as
> > {open,libre}office documents in the toplevel documentation
> > directory.
>
> I prefer to remove the techdoc entirely. I think it, or something like
> it, is a sore need but ten year old documentation doesn't do anybody
> any favors. We can always pull it back out of source control later if
> we miss it. :)I just had a quick view at the techdoc. Yes, it's old and incomplete (only file and capability rules are listed). But I'm quite sure lots of things (probably everything about file and capability rules) are still valid. That's the good thing about AppArmor - it's quite stable (besides added features) so that something you learned 10 years ago is still valid ;-) > So, for the "delete the docs": > > Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arn...@canonical.com> I vote for keeping techdoc and creating the PDF at tarball creation, so apparmor-build_docs_w_tarball.patch Acked-by: Christian Boltz <appar...@cboltz.de> I didn't test your patch, so please create a test tarball to make sure the PDF really gets packaged (and isn't the victim of some "make clean" that might be part of the tarball build process ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Wenn es jemand gibt, der Facebook derzeit noch stoppen kann, dann wohl Google. Regentraufen- und Pestcholera-Vergleich bitte hier einfügen. [http://praegnanz.de/weblog/ein-tag-vier-interessante-news]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
