On 12/06/2016 07:14 AM, daniel curtis wrote: > > Hi, > > Please forgive me, writing message one by one, but I think, that maybe 'deny > capability sys_ptrace,' is responsible for such entries? I'm asking, because > of operation="ptrace", which can be found in a log files etc. > > What do you think? Once again - I'm sorry. > no, capability sys_ptrace, isn't responsible for this entry, it is squarely on ptrace rules, more specifically no one rule is causing this it looks like a kernel bug in the enforcement or logging of ptrace rules
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
