Yes, we both have, but we decided to use Qt because it is more flexive and have better graphics than GTK+. And there are already a few cl gtk bindings:
http://tenkan.org/clgtk/ http://leonardoce.interfree.it/gtkserver/index.html<http://tenkan.org/clgtk/> But we couldn't find a Qt one. 2007/8/1, Justin Heyes-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > That would be very useful. Have you considered using GTK+ though? > > Justin > > On 01/08/07, Gustavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I and a friend are starting to develop a game maker (mostly RPG) in CL > > (using lispbuilder, of course) and we need Qt bindings for developing > it. > > Once there is already a Windows and a Mac version of Qt, we think this > is a > > good idea for the portability of the code, and the developers could use > Qt > > designer, which I think is a great and simple gui api. > > Since we'll make these bindings and the Application Builder team > requested > > it too, we could make it also to work with Application Builder, if, of > > course, you don't mind us to do this job. If you have some > expecification > > about how the package cl-Qt must be, or some ideas, please tell us so we > can > > make it better. > > Well, that's it for now. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > application-builder mailing list > > application-builder@lispniks.com > > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder > > > > > _______________________________________________ > application-builder mailing list > application-builder@lispniks.com > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder >
_______________________________________________ application-builder mailing list application-builder@lispniks.com http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
