Oops, accudentally sent to Bojan in PM only, sorry about that! Here's the list copy:
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 12:08 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 08:51 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > Quoting VilleSkyttä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > FYI, libapreq2 2.06 RPMS for Fedora Core 4 (and soon development) are > > > available from Fedora Extras, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras > > > > Any chance you could include *.tag files in the docs directory of > > libapreq2-devel package? > > Sure, no problem. But a few questions, I'm not that intimately familiar > with the docs system: > > Is it optimal to have apr.tag and apu.tag in libapreq2-devel, or would > they be better placed in apr-devel and apr-util-devel, where the > corresponding docs are, too? > > The *.tag files contain <path>s to /home/joe/src/apache/... which > obviously isn't a valid path for others than Joe. Should I change that > to something else? If yes, should it point to the dir containing the > referenced headers (/usr/include/...), or their HTML docs > (/usr/share/doc/...)? > > I opted for the docs dir in the above and rolled test packages, it'd be > great if you could check them out before I commit: > http://cachalot.mine.nu/tmp/ > > On a related note, using bugzilla.redhat.com (product "Fedora Extras", > component libapreq2) for bug reports and RFE's is the preferred issue > report channel for this package, feedback there is more likely to be > noticed and less likely to fall through the cracks.
