On 2005/09/22 14:11, Eli Marmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the way: it may be based on libapreq2. And if I come into it, > then what about the following idea: to add some authentication > functions to libapreq2; In any case, it already does most of the > work, including GET/POST parameter manipulation, as well as cookie > manipulation.
I believe we should not add anything about authentication to libapreq. It is currently a generic request parser, and should stay so. Adding authentication would require to make assumptions about the authentication procedure, which in turn forces users to follow our assumptions. There is no disadvantage in implementing authentication in an additional library. Max
