Andy Grundman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm working on trying to improve the performance of Catalyst's body parsing. > We're currently using the all-Perl HTTP::Body, and it actually beats > APR::Request for urlencoded data. The regexes are pretty simple, so this > isn't too surprising.
I just ran a few microbenchmarks comparing apreq's urldecoding parser to HTTP::Body, and apreq came out about 10x faster. How are you getting your results? -- Joe Schaefer
