On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Philip M. Gollucci <pgollu...@p6m7g8.com> wrote: > Michael Koziarski wrote: >>> >>> It should definitely not be deprecated. Its kind of 'core' to the >>> module. >> >> But unless I'm mistaken, it'll just silently fail in these situations >> with malformed bodies? What would be the suggested action in that >> situation? something like this? > > I think step one is to come up with a test that reproduces the break in the > docs. Commit it as 'skip', then fix the code so the test passes ensuring we > don't break anything else in the process.
OK, I'm about to spend a week travelling but I've added this to my TODO list. I'm far from an expert with this stuff so apologies if it takes me a little while. At the very least I'll get us a request body which repeatedly triggers it. > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 > Consultant - P6M7G8 Inc. http://p6m7g8.net > Senior System Admin - RideCharge, Inc. http://ridecharge.com > 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C > > Work like you don't need the money, > love like you'll never get hurt, > and dance like nobody's watching. > -- Cheers Koz
