Adam Prime wrote: > Issac Goldstand wrote: >> I'd like this to get good review, so posting here so even folks who >> aren't on the commit mailing-list can comment. >> >> Please take a look at the 1.x/RELEASE file and comment. >> >> Thanks, >> Issac >> > > This revision still mentions crosspointing to modperl@, is that still > to be taken out? I don't think so. It would help to get some modperl folks to test it, even if they can't cast a binding vote. > Given the problems with md5, should that hashing algorithm still be > used? I imagine that it's problems, coupled with the fact that the > file has to actually untar too would probably mitigate md5's problems > significantly, but i still thought i'd mention it. Well, gpg is there to securely provide integrity. I've always seen MD5 as a "quick glance" way of seeing if things look ok. > > Just being a bystander on this list, i don't know how you tell the > difference between who's a committer and who's on the PMC. I imagine > this isn't a problem for people that have been one or the other for a > while, but it wouldn't hurt to point to a list of PMC members or > something. > I actually don't know if there's such a list. Anyone? > Section 8 also confuses me a bit because it says that > > if there is a "majority consensus" (three +1 and more +1s > than -1s) among the httpd PMC members, the RM may proceed with the > release. > > But then goes on to say that > > If any -1s are received, the release is rejected. > > So which is it? (i presume the last one) >
Good point. 3 +1s and no -1s
