----- Original Message ----
> From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>
> To: Steve Hay <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 11:59:21 AM
> Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
>
> > From: Steve Hay
> > To: Joe Schaefer ; [email protected]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 11:46:12 AM
> > Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
> >
> > Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message ----
> > >
> > >> From: Steve Hay
> > >> To: Joe Schaefer ; [email protected]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 8:52:58 AM
> > >> Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
> > >>
> > >> Steve Hay wrote:
> > >>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>> From: Joe Schaefer
> > >>>>> To: Steve Hay ; [email protected]
> > >>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 6:46:33 AM
> > >>>>> Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> From: Steve Hay
> > >>>>>> To: Joe Schaefer ; [email protected]
> > >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 4:03:40 AM
> > >>>>>> Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I cut a tarball from trunk that Randy
> > >>>>>>> and company can test out on Win32:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~joes/libapreq2-trunk.tar.gz
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Assuming it gets tested and generally agreed
> > >>>>>>> to be worth releasing, is anyone willing to
> > >>>>>>> do the honors and volunteer for RM duties?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Still doesn't build on Win32:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [...]
> > >>>>>> cl.exe /Fo"C:\Temp\LIBAPR~1.12\win32\libs\handle.obj" /nologo /MD
> > >>>>>> /W3 /O2 /D "WIN32" /D "NDEBUG" /D "_WINDOWS" /D "_MBCS" /D
> > >>>>>> "_USRDLL" /D "APREQ_DECLARE_EXPORT" /I"C:\apache2.2\include"
> > >>>>>> /I"C:\Temp\LIBAPR~1.12\include"
> > >>>>>> /I"C:\Temp\LIBAPR~1.12\module\apache2" /YX /FD /c
> > >>>>>> C:\Temp\LIBAPR~1.12\module\apache2\handle.c
> > >>>>>> cl : Command line warning D9002 : ignoring unknown option '/YX'
> > >>>>>> handle.c
> > >>>>>> c:\temp\libapreq2-2.12\module\apache2\apreq_module_apache2.h(149)
> > >>>>>>> error C2059: syntax error : '('
> > >>>>>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
> > >>>>>> Studio 8\VC\bin\cl.exe"' : return code '0x2'
> > >>>>>> Stop.
> > >>>>>> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
> > >>>>>> Studio 8\VC\bin\nmake.exe"' : return code '0x2'
> > >>>>>> Stop.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I guess it's tripping up on
> > >>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=744417, which I
> > >>>>>> assume was an attempt to do something similar to my hack in
> > >>>>>> http://marc.info/?l=apreq-dev&m=123391925319834&w=2
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yeah, that looks like the problem this time. Any idea what those
> > >>>>> macros now expand to on your machine? (I'm pretty sure the reason
> > >>>>> your hack doesn't work is because of the _stdcall thingy).
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Steve, I just uploaded a new tarball (same url) with the latest fix
> > >>>> attempt. Any improvements this time?
> > >>>
> > >>> Sadly not: still the same error.
> > >>>
> > >>> Here's the pre-processor's output this time:
> > >>>
> > >>> __declspec(dllexport) apreq_handle_t * __stdcall
> > >>> apreq_handle_apache2(request_rec *r);
> > >>>
> > >>> typedef apreq_handle_t * __stdcall (apr_OFN_apreq_handle_apache2_t)
> > >>> (request_rec *r);
> > >>
> > >> Hmm. I'm not hot on this syntax, but it compiles if you move the
> > >> __stdcall *inside* the first set of parentheses:
> > >>
> > >> typedef apreq_handle_t *(__stdcall apr_OFN_apreq_handle_apache2_t)
> > >> (request_rec *r);
> > >
> > > Interesting. We may need to just hand-code it this way for WIN32.
> > > The next question is, do the tests compile and pass?
> >
> > Yes, using the attached patch everything builds okay and all the tests
> > pass.
>
>
> Patch applied, tarball uploaded. Thanks a bunch!
Latest tarball compiles, tests and installs cleanly on Solaris 10.
