BTW... should we then mark all of the -gtk related bugs as "wontfix", with a comment to all of them pointing to this ML thread, as a kind of documentation for people interested in the GTK part?
Cheers. 2012/3/20 Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > 2012/3/20 Daniel Hartwig <[email protected]>: >> On 20 March 2012 20:54, Axel Beckert <[email protected]> wrote: >>> [...] >>> Do you think of removing the code or just of no more building the >>> package? >> >> No more building, like the Qt tree. > > OK, I agree. > > I also agree with everything else said in these two e-mails. > > Thanks for bringing this to a wider audience, the proposed blog post > (I also don't have a blog myself), and for the quick and thoughtful > replies to my "RFC". > > > Regards. _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
