+1 on both Rong
On 9/16/14 10:06 AM, "Greg White" <[email protected]> wrote: >+1 on both > >On 9/16/14, 7:58 AM, "Dave Taht" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> >>>We would like feedback right now on adopting: >>>1 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-01 >>>and >>>2 - http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nichols-tsvwg-codel-02 >>> >>>towards the charter milestone for submitting algorithm >>>specifications to the IESG. Whether they are Proposed Standard >>>or Experimental can be debated now or later, but we want to >>>probe if there's critical mass to adopt them first. >> >>+1 on both. >> > >_______________________________________________ >aqm mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
