That might be a comment to make. On Oct 30, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
> I didn't get past the first sentence. > > "The question boils down to quantify buffer sizes and yet achieve 100% > utilization on links with maximum > throughput at a feasible cost. " > > My goal has always been to have minimal induced latency and reasonable > utilization, and also to keep my blood pressure low. Reading further > strikes me as damaging to both goals. > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <[email protected]> wrote: >> Folks from AQM may be interested to comment on >> draft-ksubram-lmap-router-buffer-sizes on the lmap list. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aqm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm >> > > > > -- > Dave Täht > > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ aqm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
