Is there a typo or paste error below? The text reads :
"...and an optional distributed model in which a centralized...(snip)"

Is it centralized or distributed?

Randy


> On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:36 AM, Philippe Klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> IEEE 1905.1 is a protocol that has been designed (I was one of the initial 
> designer)for building a topology data base of the hybrid home network for 
> diagnostic purpose (despite the initial claim in the PAR) and  not a  
> protocol for dynamic purpose (for example as it’s the message traffic was  
> intended to be low , the protocol did not took in account the traffic 
> overhead and the multiplication of messages the protocol could create.
>  
> A stronger approach will be to consider combining the Layer 3 routing 
> protocol with the L2 IEEE 802.1Qca which provide SPB on multiple paths 
> (editor: [email protected]). 802.1Qca will allow to optimize the 
> bandwidth by allowing to use the *whole* topology of the home network in a 
> loopfree manner (a simple RSTP might result in using only a subset of the 
> topology).
>  
> Additionally 802.1Qca could use the *same* IS-IS database that the one used 
> by the L3 protocol and an optional  distributed model in which one 
> centralized computation path element CPE could remotely populate the (L2) 
> forwarding table of CP (passive node that do not compute paths)  thru LSPs:  
> the same IS-IS protocol will benefit to both L3 and L2 and this is a big 
> advantage adding any protocol on low end CE nodes that have limited resources 
> is always a challenge and often a roadblock to successful acceptance and 
> deployment.
>  
> 802.1Qca is not agnostic to IS-IS and any protocol that could populate the 
> topology database will be fine too.
>  
> There is a group of people that are active in both  IETF and IEEE 802 that 
> are ready to discuss this approach to create a long needed coherent L3 & L2 
> stack.
> Sincerely
> /Philippe
>  
> Philippe Klein, PhD |Technical Director, Broadband Technology Group
> Broadcom Corporation | Golan House, P.O.Box 273, Airport City, 70100 Israel
> (M) +972 54 313 4500 | [email protected]
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> From: homenet [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Taht
> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 6:35 AM
> To: Hans Liu
> Cc: HOMENET Working Group; STARK, BARBARA H; Claire Cheng; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a
>  
> up until this moment I had never heard of 
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1905
> 
> this spec, and it does sound useful.
> 
> +10 on more open access to it. +100 on anyone working on open source code for 
> it.
> 
> I would certainly like closer relationships between the IEEE and IETF one 
> day, perhaps even a truly joint (as opposed to back to back) conference. For 
> far too long members of these two orgs have been going to different parties, 
> and many, many cross layer issues have arisen due to this.
> 
> In my own case I had hoped (in dropping ietf) to be able to attend more IEEE 
> 802.11 wg meetings - but I would really prefer to stay home and code for a 
> while.
> 
> I would be very supportive of someone(s) taking on the tasks of better 
> grokking wifi and other non-ethernet media across both orgs both in the 
> context of homenet and in aqm.
> 
> PS While I have a good grip on cable media layers, I am lacking such on 
> gpon...
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to