Thanks all.  

I've submitted the draft.  Pending approval of the WG chairs, it will be
available for review.

-Greg


On 3/27/15, 3:52 PM, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi group,
>
>as there haven't been any objections, but some indications of support on
>the list, and based on the responses in the IETF92 meeting in Dallas, we
>chairs think this document can be adopted as WG-item at this time.
>
>
>Greg, can you please upload the most recent version as
>draft-ietf-aqm-docsis-pie-00?
>
>Also, as mentioned in the meeting, and to make true of my promise, I
>would like to invite the following individuals to review this draft, once
>the updated version becomes available.
>
>Mikael Abrahamsson
>Dave Dolson
>Szilveszter NĂ¡das
>
>Mostly everybody else who has commented during the meeting is already
>assigned to other documents (Nobody will be left out :)
>
>Thanks,
>  Richard (co-chair)
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: aqm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scheffenegger,
>> Richard
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2015 08:45
>> To: Greg White; '[email protected]'
>> Cc: Rong Pan (ropan); [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [aqm] adoption of draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie-01
>> 
>> Hi Greg, group,
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Regarding the adoption call, this is something we can actually (and
>> should) start on the list.
>> 
>> We can confirm that during the Dallas meeting in the room, but even
>>before
>> that, we'd like to get responses on the list now...
>> 
>> Perhaps we have some volunteers to review this new version as well...
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>>   Richard
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Greg White [mailto:[email protected]]
>> > Sent: Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2015 01:13
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Cc: Rong Pan (ropan)
>> > Subject: Re: [aqm] agenda for IETF 92 / Dallas
>> >
>> > Wes & Richard,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately I will not be at IETF92 in person, but will attend
>> remotely.
>> >  For draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie, Rong & I updated it in January and
>> > included a new appendix to give a change log, which reads:
>> >
>> > ===============
>> > Appendix B.  Change Log
>> > B.1.  Since draft-white-aqm-docsis-pie-01
>> >
>> >    Added Change Log.
>> >
>> >    Removed discussion of Packet drop de-randomization, Enhanced burst
>> >    protection, and 16ms update interval, as these are now included in
>> >    [I-D.ietf-aqm-pie].
>> >
>> > ===============
>> >
>> >
>> > Regarding WG adoption, I saw some support from Lars (and no
>>objections)
>> to
>> > adopting it on an Informational track.   Will you do an official
>> adoption
>> > call at the Dallas meeting?
>> >
>> > -Greg
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2/23/15, 8:40 PM, "Wesley Eddy" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Greetings AQMers!  We requested a short AQM meeting slot at the
>> > >upcoming IETF 92 meeting in Dallas, and we received a 1-hour slot on
>> Tuesday:
>> > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/92/agenda.html
>> > >
>> > >Since this is not a lot of time, we'll need to prioritize the work
>> > >that is discussed to what requires the face-to-face time in order to
>> > >make progress on.
>> > >
>> > >For active draft editors, please let us know via this list or
>> > >[email protected] what you think your meeting time needs are,
>> > >so we can put together an agenda.  If you don't need meeting time
>> > >now, or would like to use an interim telecon to assist in gathering
>> > >feedback, please also let us know.
>> > >
>> > >For others, please read the drafts, comment on this mailing list, and
>> > >help us to review and complete them:
>> > >https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/aqm/documents/
>> > >
>> > >Thanks in advance!
>> > >
>> > >--
>> > >Wes Eddy
>> > >MTI Systems
>> > >
>> > >_______________________________________________
>> > >aqm mailing list
>> > >[email protected]
>> > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aqm mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm

Reply via email to