On Thu, 12 Apr 2018, Jonathan Morton wrote:
Yes, and that's a policy I can support (as far as it goes). I'd much
rather have, say, 100ms of bloat than 45000ms (which I've previously
encountered).
So after some more testing I discovered I kind of need:
class mikabr-LE
random-detect 50 ms 1000 ms
bandwidth percent 5
Because the "50ms" is calculated out of the "5%", which means when there
is no other traffic, "50ms" means 2.5ms of buffer with 0% loss
probability. Unfortunately it means 50ms of buffer when there is lots of
other traffic (when it's only getting 5-8% of total capacity).
But I imagine bufferbloating LE should have no negative consequences as
there should be no interactive traffic marked with LE, right?
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
