I was trying to figure out, which contributions to Arachne can be
easily accepted and which take long time to incorporate....
Many people keep on sending me let's say documentation files without
spelling errors or translated documentation files. This is problem,
because I am changing my main version of documentation all the time,
and until Arahcne Labs XML translation toolkit is finaly released, it
will be hard to merge the updates.
On the other hand, simple .TXT files like ARAMDISK.TXT or KEYWORDS.TXT
contributed by Clarence Verge, or changes in open-sourced DGI modules,
which I am not changing very often, seem to be very easy to be included
to main Arachne package. Also any simple TXT fragements describing briefly
how to setup Arachne with certain category of hardware (ISDN, PNP modem)
are very easy to incorporate to main Arachne package....
Currently, one of urgently needed documentation updates is new list
of Arachne icons. The current one is incomplete, because Arachne toolbars
have grown beyond all limits, and there are at least 30 different
function available through toolbar icons... anyone interested in
writing new icons.htm file ? I promise I won't touch icons.htm anytime
soon myself!
--
Michael Polak: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arachne Labs: http://arachne.cz/
My mobile phone - up to 160 characters: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
