Da Silva, Joe wrote:
> Sure - if you "manually" copy one string to another, obviously
> your second string needs storage space. However, how often
> is this done in the code? I can't image the domain name string
> needs to be copied too often (you would only need to do this to
> make a temporary modification to the string ...). If we have a few
> more bytes times a few temporary copies, this is still not much
> extra RAM; without knowing how often you make temporary
> copies of the domain name string, I would _guess_ that even
> *doubling* it's size would add perhaps 200 _extra_ bytes (?).
> This is certainly worth doing.
You would be surprised, but URL structure is used as member structure of
each frame, of each cache item,
of each image, etc.
