On Mon, 08 Apr 2002 23:16:27 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2002 00:59:02 -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> wrote:
>>> The correct 4 bytes are being "grabbed" from cache.idx
>> Are you really sure that it is the correct bytes??
>> (The filesize is not correct, sometimes files are in Gigabyte sizes )
> Yes, I'm sure.
> My example was not hypothetical.
> These are the 4 bytes that wwwman grabbed from the cache.idx file.
> C2 1A B2 3C = 1,018,305,218
> (date/time of file in question = Apr 08 18:33:42 2002 )
> 1,018,305,218 seconds after Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 == Apr 08 18:33:42 2002
Oops, that *should* read... Apr 08 18:33:38 2002
The cache.idx must be using the time that the D/L was started.
DOS appearently uses the time of when the file was closed.
(the D/L took 3sec)
BTW,
Here's a comparison of cache.idx from v1.68 and v1.70
(cachedif.zip on my D/L page)
The important stuff....
Listing directory: C:\1SEND\
Name mask: *.*
168INDEX.IDX 478 4-09-2002 18:29:12 -----A--
168INDEX.TXT 2052 4-09-2002 18:32:16 -----A--
170INDEX.IDX 486 4-09-2002 18:27:52 -----A--
170INDEX.TXT 2052 4-09-2002 18:32:40 -----A--
DIRLIST.TXT 0 4-09-2002 18:58:30 -----A--
Sub-Directories: 0
5068 bytes used in 5 files.
5068 bytes used in 5 files in 1 directories.
--- clipped from 168index.txt ---
(offset ( hex values stored )
into
file)
0001D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF FF 35 6B B3 3C 01 00
(_______________________"lastseen"__^^ ^^ ^^ ^^__)
_________________________________
--- clipped from 170index.txt ---
(offset ( hex values stored )
into
file)
0001D0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 FF FF
0001E0 E6 6A B3 3C 01 00
("lstsn"__^^ ^^ ^^ ^^__)
_________________________________
So, core.exe v1.68 and v1.70 *are* storing the "lastseen" date/time
into cache.idx using the same format.
The 2 .IDXs were created 80sec apart.
The difference between the info stored in the .IDXs .... 79
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
