On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 14:37:44 +1000, da Silva, Joe wrote:

> OK, what's the implication if this is increased? I presume it's
> more memory required? Well, since Arachne itself requires
> substantial memory, and if that's the only implication, we
> should increase the limit as far as possible, without exceeding
> Arachne's own memory usage.

> I don't have a problem with making this user-configurable, but
> would there be any advantage in that? (The short answer is,
> the more the merrier;-).

> Joe.


OK, it's now a "moot point". :(

I just tested wwwman recompiled with maxdiritems 2048

It crashes the system.

You're just going to have to get used to using more directories. <g>





>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:        Glenn McCorkle [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent:        Friday, April 12, 2002 2:17 PM
>> To:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject:     Re: problem found (was Re: no more "old indexes"....)

>> On Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:58:57 +1000, da Silva, Joe wrote:

>> > This CNM and MES stuff is mail-related, isn't it?

>> > So, this is an issue for 'insight' only (I think), not 'wwwman', which
>> > works great now, as far as I can see (except for the limitation on
>> > directory size;-).

>> > Joe.

>> Yes, quite correct.
>> I was referring only to insight.

>> Now, as for dir size limit in wwwman.
>> How many files should we set as the limit?

>> --- current limit in wwwman.cpp ---
>> #define maxdiritems 1024
>> ___________________________________

>> Is that not big enough?
>> Should we make it user configurable?

>> >> -----Original Message-----

>> >> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:15:40 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:

>> >> <snip>

>> >> > Any .htm file generated with the old version of wwwman will not have
>> >> > "nocache". So *will* be cached by core.

>> >> > Any that were created by the new version will have so won't be.<VBG>

>> >> > The same holds true for old vs new (idxfast, idxhead, insight)
>> >> > (old version HTMs will be cached... new ones will not be)

>> >> Uh oh...
>> >> I found a problem with my changes. :(

>> >> --- clipped from hdrout.c ---
>> >> //!!glennmcc: begin Apr 10, 2002
>> >> //!!glennmcc: begin Apr 11, 2002
>> >> //removed  printf("<ARACHNE NOCACHE>\n");
>> >> //(bad idea because it prevents cacheing of converted CNMs, MESs etc)
>> :(
>> >> //!!glennmcc: end
>> >> _____________________________

>> >> The newest hdrout.c and insight.exe are now uploaded to
>> >> changes/glennmcc/insight

>> --
>>  Glenn
>>  http://arachne.cz/
>>  http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
>>  http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
>>  http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/

-- 
 Glenn
 http://arachne.cz/
 http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
 http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
 http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/

Reply via email to