ted olausson wrote: > >From: Glenn McCorkle > Sent: 2/14/1997 9:46:02 AM > >Please, > >Have a look at the "mailer" line in the header of this message. > >;UE == User Edition. > >and .glennmcc to indicate who compliled this particular core.exe > >Comments, suggestions... > >Do you like this idea or not? > > Does this mean that the source for arachne is open? > If so, could i get a copy of it too.. > > If it isnt going to divide int o several distros then i see no use in > the UE part, otherwise is it a good idea. > > >Should I also add the date it was compiled? > >Arachne V1.71;UE.glennmcc-Oct_06,2002 > > Yes, it would make it easier to keep track of UE-updates. > But 20021006 is maybe a slightly better approach.
But what about just adding new versioning - UE01, UE02 ...? don't forget the string is part of User-agent: header string in http request, it would waste bandwidth if it is too long... -- Michael "xChaos" Polak, +420 603 872 631 http://arachne.cz/ - webhosting, Linux, WWW browser Arachne http://teckacz.cz/ - e-zine pro roztristene vedomi http://mp3records.cz/ - download music 100% legal and free http://vojna.cz/ - hnuti za zruseni vojenske i civilni sluzby http://legalizace.cz/ - stop drug war and release victims!
