L. D. Best wrote:
> Jake's correct on that. But the way PTS has Arachne bundled in his
> package makes it impossible to tell what is where without first
> installing the entire OS. I don't want to do that yet, do I? No.
> Maybe later when I'm feeling brave.
> In the docs the author of PTsDOS states that Arachne doesn't belong to
> him, but I'd be interested in finding out if it is made clear anywhere
> that Arachne is not free, and that an updated version might not run on
> PTS.
> Another one to add to my "round tuit" list ...
I have been using PTS-DOS v.6.51 for about two years now. It seems
generally to be quite good and very compatible with Arachne thru v.1.60B1.
However, after v.6.51 was released, it is my understanding that Paragon
Technology Systems split into two rival companies, each using the same
name. There have since been releases of PTS-DOS with higher version
numbers and lesser capabilities! What the current situation is, I don't
know.
Ken Martwick
