At 31.08.2000 03:53:00, you wrote:
>>
>Thats because Windows 95, 98, and ME are not operation systems.
>
snip
>>
>
>If MS wanted to hide DOS in Windows ME, they should have designated Win2000 as
>the upgrade to both NT & 98. But then users would be pinched with 64 MB RAM:
>
snip
>
>A few months ago, I pointed out an article in windows.about.com (I forget the
>full URL) about the trickiness getting a DOS prompt in Windows ME. My subject
>was "Don't Windows ME!"
>
>Now what happens to DOS when Intel's Itanium and/or AMD's Sledgehammer become
>widespread? Maybe find a home with Arachne on cell phones and other handheld
>devices? Caldera/Lineo is already using DR-DOS and Embrowser on set-top boxes.
>
snip
Hello,
IMOH Embrowser works on Lineos Linux Emlinux or so? Is there a DOS Embrowser?
I think we will see the great battle Linux v. win2000 (may be I stand behinde
the Linux flag?-DOSemu isnīt that bad :)-
regards, Joerg
