Clarence Verge wrote:
> What can I say ? I tried to write something but I then felt it would pixx
> off too many so I deleted it. <G>
>
> There isn't much point arguing, because MOST "C" programmers refuse to
> believe their code could be less than ideal.
> The only thing that really matters is results, and EVEN THEN, when it is
> SHOWN that the ASM routine runs 3 to 10 times faster and is 5 to 10 times
> smaller, they ask "Who cares ? Get a new computer !"
>
> That's the problem. :(
>
> - Clarence Verge
> --
> - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
> - The internet is infected - Windows is a VIRUS !!
> --
Relax... I still use assembly even more than C in my work.
The reasons I sometimes tend to do C programming are mostly the lack of time
at my disposal and, very important, the existence of the floating point and
math libraries.
Anyway, when it comes to buggy, crappy, hastily written software, it really
doesn't matter what tools had been used to produce it.
--
Cristian Burneci
DHP Technology SRL
Bucharest, Romania
