On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 03:19:47 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > On Fri, 09 Nov 2001 20:22:39 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 03:11:26 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: >>> Ahah! That means it IS Insight that ignores the existence of the already >>> generated index then ? >>> Don't you wish this had come up before your recent improvement to Insight ? >>> <G> >> Nope. >> Insight can't make the decision one way or the other as to >> either "ignoring" it or paying attention to it. >> (all insight does is to go right ahead and do what core tells it to do) >> Core makes the determination as to whether or not to have >> insight create the index file. >> 1) file exists..... display it. >> 2) file does not exist..... tell insight to create it. >> 3) file exists but for some unknown reason core did not see it.... tell >> insight to create it >> (therefore overwriting the one that was already there) >> Maybe it's a "full-cache". > That is illogical, Mr Spock. > If I hit "I" (after creating an index), a new index is NEVER created. > If I select a message and view it, thereby getting an "INDEX" button, > and hit that button, a new index is ALWAYS created. > If instead I had hit "I" there will be no new index. > If instead I hit "ESC" (for back) SOMETIMES a new index is created. > Seems to me the cache is just as full in all the above conditions. ;-) > Also seems to me that core is the thing interpreting both hotkey "I" > and the button argument file://inbox.dgi. Seems they do not resolve > to the same thing. i.e. ok, Insight re-creates the index when core > exercises the line in mime.cfg. That's fair. > But shouldn't core check to see if the index exists first ? > It seems do that on the "I" hotkey. :) You say: "....SOMETIMES a new index is created." When "sometimes" occures. Is there a fullmoon??? <g> -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
