On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:30:46 +0100, you wrote: > Actually I was hoping for a slightly faster procedure, but obviously no-one > reading the list has any influence on the caretaker himself...
> Thanks anyway > BRB > At 12:02 26-11-02 -0500, you wrote: >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:58:57 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> -------- Oorspronkelijk bericht -------- >>> Onderwerp: Majordomo results >>> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Datum: Din, november 26, 2002 4:56 pm >>> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> -- >>>>>>> unsubscribe arachne >>>>>> Sorry, an error has occurred while processing your request >>>>>> The caretaker of Majordomo ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) has >>>>>> been notified of the problem. >> Majordomo and his caretaker should both be court-martialed by the >> kernel for dereliction of duty. >> Sam Heywood >> -- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/ Summary executions for both of them would be a faster procedure, but resorting to such a rash measure would cause the list to go down until some competent replacements could be trained. I don't know who is Majordomo's caretaker, but it doesn't matter who he is. Majordomo will not be allowed to get away with blaming everything on his subordinate to whom he himself delegated the authority. Ultimately it is Majordomo's responsibility to see that the list is properly administered. If Majordomo were a competent officer he would have allowed only a most outstanding sergeant major to be his caretaker. Sam Heywood -- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
