On Tue, 27 May 2003 07:53:00 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:40 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>>> Arachne works ok for low volume situations and is easy to setup >>> and use. It just has limitations. And it's not apt to be "fixed" >>> any time soon because of the small number of users. >> 1. My situation is low volume... 34 messages today is still classed as >> low, isn't it? >> 2. AFAIK Glenn McCorkle is still working on upgrades of Arachne, >> regardless of the low number of users. Maybe its weaknesses will be >> "fixed" one day. > Yep, 34 messages is low volume. If you had a couple of hundred to > sort through then Arachne's Insight would drive you crazy. > Yes, we can hope that improvements are coming from Glenn and perhaps > from others. Sam, Over 2 years ago, as a test.....sent 600 messages to my own address. I found then that the limit in Arachne is 512. What is it that you would like to be able to do in sorting of large numbers of messages ? So-long-as what you'de like is not 'too complex'. I'll see if I can accommodate your request. -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/ http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/aqc/
