Hi Frank, Here is the YCSB with ArangoDB code, you can try it. Any problem, contact me. https://github.com/smallsmallc/YCSB/tree/arangodb/arangodb
On Thursday, May 5, 2016 at 12:15:10 AM UTC+8, Frank Celler wrote: > > Hi Yemin, > > we used the mongodb nodejs driver 2.0.33 which contains a native C++ > extensions during the tests. Hopefully, that means that the driver is > better than the native ArangoDB in Javascript. > > However, as always there is a good chance that there are problems in the > ArangoDB Java driver. At least in other languages there were always > pitfalls with the http driver. Therefore it would be important, that we can > reproduce your finding and understand, what is going on in the Java driver. > > As I understand it, the YCSB is publically availably. Where can I download > your ArangoDB driver for YCSB? Is it also on github? > > Thanks > > > Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2016 17:28:34 UTC+2 schrieb Yemin: >> >> Official test result shows that ArangoDB is much faster than MongoDB for >> insert. ( >> https://www.arangodb.com/2015/10/benchmark-postgresql-mongodb-arangodb/) >> I re-run your nodejs benchmark and got the same result, but I found that >> benchmark itself was 100% CPU and it's single thread. It only means that >> MongoDB's nodejs client is worse than ArangoDB's. It can not show the >> insert performance of server side by that nodejs benchmark. >> >> Actually I re-run the perf test of ArangoDB and MongoDB using YCSB. It >> shows MongoDB is more than 2 times faster than ArangoDB in insert, update, >> read. >> >> Just post my investigation here for your reference. >> >> Thx! >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ArangoDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
