Was a minor issue, setting number of server threads explicitly solved this.
On Thursday, March 2, 2017 at 1:19:10 AM UTC+1, Mike Atambo wrote: > > False positive, i thought i had it. but nope that was not it, its till > super slow, i was > accidentally running it in single instance mode rather than cluster. > > > On Saturday, February 25, 2017 at 10:14:35 PM UTC+1, Mike Atambo wrote: >> >> seems like a netowork issue with virtual interfaces: (tun0) >> can anyone explain this behaviour? >> here is an update to the github issue: >> https://github.com/arangodb/arangodb/issues/2324 >> >> >> On Saturday, February 25, 2017 at 2:42:55 AM UTC+1, Mike Atambo wrote: >>> >>> Im trying to get arangodb cluster working, but i have had a problem >>> getting it to work properly, >>> an arangosh connection takes a dozen seconds to complete, the web UI >>> responds equally slowly, >>> this is with 3.2-alpha-1. >>> So im going to as, has anyone run 3.2-alpha-1 or 3.1.11 in cluster >>> mode? does it work for you? >>> if it works for anyone out there, would be nice to know so i can keep >>> looking for the cause. >>> here is an issue I opened, no reply yet: >>> https://github.com/arangodb/arangodb/issues/2324 >>> logs are attached. >>> >>> Mike. >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ArangoDB" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
