On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 02:09:45 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote: Sounds good even though I have no way of testing it yet!
> The existing core sound code was rather broken (1 > channel output worked, but 2+ would mostly be garbage) and didn't seem to > be structured too well from the perspective of delivering data at a > consistent rate. Hmm, I thought my sound was awful because it was the first time I'd tried to output sound (it improves with load IIRC), nice to know it may not be that after all... > In the next couple of weeks I'll try and tidy up a few of the loose ends > and get the X & Windows versions working again. I can also have a stab at > fixing the other versions, but I don't have any way of testing them. If you can update everything so it "should" work, that makes it easier for the frontend maintainers to get it working again. A lot of the frontend code is a cut'n'paste job between platforms anyway. Once that's done I'll update your arcem-fast branch in CVS. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-d2d-2 -- arcem-devel mailing list arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel
