On Jan 4, 2008 11:21 AM, Andreas Radke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:28:49 -0600 > schrieb "Aaron Griffin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I'd test.. but I have no idea what these libs do and/or are for. What > > test did you perform? > > http://www.gnupg.org/related_software/libraries.en.html > > libgcrypt > Libgcrypt is a general purpose cryptographic library based on the code > from GnuPG. It provides functions for all cryptographic building > blocks: symmetric ciphers, hash algorithms, MACs, public key > algorithms, large integer functions, random numbers and a lot of > supporting functions. > > libgpg-error > Libgpg-error is helper library used by a couple of other projects to > provide a common set of error codes and descriptions. > > > I haven't done any deep testing. I'm happy that lddd didn't report any > broken linking. I took these packages just to prevent that they are not > orphaned. If we have somebody who knows them better tell me. > > For my system: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] andyrtr]# env LANG=C pacman -Qi libgpg-error libgcrypt | > grep Required > Required By : dirmngr gpgme libgcrypt libksba > Required By : cryptsetup dirmngr gnupg2 libnetworkmanager libxslt > > Test any of these packages and tell me if you find something broken.
<http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/9114> So...we have some issues here, and this got moved to core. I wanted to go back and see who signed off to see who tested, and am quite surprised to see not a single signoff for i686. Why on earth did this get moved out of testing? Usually I don't like to point fingers at a single person, but we had a clear breakdown of policy here, and its hard to spread the blame. -Dan