On Jan 23, 2008 4:21 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2008 04:27:29 schrieb Aaron Griffin: > > > On Dec 23, 2007 7:20 PM, Jason Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Potential issue: Apparently /etc/profile is not replaced if modified. > > > > Can someone verify if this is fixed or not? I will investigate further > > > > as I fear it may be a pacman bug - if so, I'm guessing keeping > > > > etc/profile in BOTH backup arrays for the time being may fix this. > > > > > > I can verify that this wasn't fixed on my update. My /etc/profile was > > > still my original one and I ended up extracting the etc/profile from the > > > filesystem package by hand. > > > > Bump now that pacman 3.1 is out the door? > > Right, because using the old profile breaks man pages stored in /usr/share/man > like the one which comes with pacman.
Yes. The packages sitting there should be fine. They've been in testing for some time. If they need a pkgrel bump, I can do that too. I just want to get these out the door before more man pages get lost (every package built with makepkg 3.1 has "broken" man pages)
