2008/1/23, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/1/23, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jan 23, 2008 2:48 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Aaron Griffin schrieb: > > > > Ah thanks, these examples help too. I honestly have never needed > > > > something like -So, so I don't know the use cases > > > > > > I'd like to point out again that -So or something similar is one of the > > > most requested features from users. > > > > That doesn't sound empirical. According to flyspray votes (the only > > empirical evidence we have), signed packages are #1: > > Hey, votes for packages were introduced way after very demanded bugs were > filed, > so votes doesn't mean much for my opinion about bug's importance. > > > http://bugs.archlinux.org/index/proj3?project=3&do=index&order=votes&sort=desc&order2=&sort2= > > > > I agree it's requested a lot, but no more than, say, sqlite backends > > and the like. > > > > Still, like Dan, I'm neutral. I don't care. But what I *do* care about > > is json/xml parsing integration into pacman. I'm just going to say > > "no" on that. > > Sure, no json/xml/yaml/etc. parsing in pacman. A separare script - > maybe. /me shrugs. > As for tarball consisting of all packages' filelists - it would be > nice if the script could rsync it (like abs in future). >
Heh, the last message in Repo filename search thread on arch-general is interesting. :-) -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)