On Feb 8, 2008 3:11 AM, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/2/8, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Feb 7, 2008 11:19 PM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2008, Paul Mattal wrote: > > > > > > > [2.5.33-3 was already used.. but I didn't notice because it wasn't in > > > > the CVS > > > > log. I've just rebuilt and uploaded as 2.5.33-4. Ignore signoff request > > > > for > > > > 2.5.33-3. -P] > > > > > > > > Andreas Radke wrote: > > > >> There's no quick solution available. > > > > > > > > I reached pretty much the same conclusion. > > > > > > > > I've just built 2.5.33-4, with force=y, and put it in testing for > > > > i686. Can someone sign off? > > > > > > > > Also if someone could build the x86_64, I'd be grateful. > > > > > > > > - P > > > > > > > > > > I've built the x86_64 package. > > > > Downloaded fine (i686) - not sure how to test. > > > > Try to build something that requires it to build, e.g. lm_sensors
lm_sensors seems to still build fine. I'll signoff - i686
