On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Thomas Bächler wrote:

eliott schrieb:
Well.. if it isn't harmful in any way, and if we would do it on
x86_64, then we should also do it on i686. Having as consistent a
baseline as possible is good.

Agreed.

As to actually doing it, are there any ramifications due to the
potential for tracking additional cpus (timeslice allocation
algorithmic changes?) that would be a noticeable performance inpact
for people running 2 or 4 cpus?

"This allows you to specify the maximum number of CPUs which this
kernel will support.  The maximum supported value is 255 and the
minimum value which makes sense is 2.

This is purely to save memory - each supported CPU adds
approximately eight kilobytes to the kernel image."

That's all they say about it.



+1 from me.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to