On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked > > > in or anything else like that? > > > > Why do you still have uncommitted changes in CVS when we initially > > began this move something like 4 or 5 weeks ago. Please commit them if > > they are important - if they are not important enough to commit after > > 5 weeks, I automatically assume they are insignificant. > > Well when i redid the udev stuff ages ago, I had to let it langish > because people told me to. And since CVS can't do offline diffs, I > don't even know if I have changes in places. I'm sorry my workflow > isn't quite like yours and that I sometimes like to view history > through command line tools.
Couldn't you just use diff? cvs diff would only give you a diff against the latest CVS, not the SVN repo, which may have changes since your changes were made?